佐藤多鶴子さんからの寄稿 The presentation of Ms Tazuko Sato

先日のICRP第三回ダイアログセミナーに参加された佐藤多鶴子さんから寄稿されましたので、公開します。

 

 

日本語のスライド (PPT, 日本語)

 ＝＝＝ここから＝＝＝

＜感謝の言葉と提言＞

首都圏からの消費者として参加した佐藤　多鶴子です。

ICRPワークショップもダイアログも初めてでしたが、

研究者や福島の方々がそれぞれ様々な事情や思いを抱えながら

（安東さんの言葉ですが）「それぞれができることをやる」姿に間近に接し

言葉に尽くせないほどよい経験と力を頂きました。

また、福島が大好きになったので、これから温泉やフルーツロードに来福する楽しみが増えました！

福島の方々に頂いた＜大切なもの＞を無駄にしないよう、わたしもできることをコツコツ頑張ります。

 

 

提言

 

ロシャールさん提案のstructured dialogue（構造をもった対話）は参加者ひとりひとりの発話だけではなく

相互作用によって理解が深まり次のステップへとそれぞれが導かれていく、ことを目指すもののように受け取りました。

具体的には１回目、2回目、3回目、と順を重ねるにつれて深まるようにするためには

 

１．座席

出来れば、対話に参加している人の顔が見えるような座席が望ましいと感じました。

（会場設営や人数による制約はあると思いますが）

せっかく会って話す機会なので、顔を見て、息遣いを感じながら、対話したい、と。

 

２．二日目からの参加者へのフォロー

途中から参加する方へのフォローを適切にする必要があると感じました。

特に複数日開催の場合、2日目以後に来た方に前日の成果をどう伝えるか、は課題だと思います。

 

３．フォローアップ

参加者の記憶が新鮮な内に

ダイアローグへの参加を通じてこう変わった、次はこうだといいな、というような

感想と提言をまとめる課題が最初から与えられているとよいと思いました。

＝＝＝ここまで＝＝＝

 

Ms Tazuko Sato who participated in the third ICRP dialogue contributed the following.

Ms Sato' slides (PPT, English)

=== from here ===

Word of thanks from Tazuko Sato, a consumer from Tokyo

Although this was my first experience participating in ICRP workshop and structured dialogue, I learned so much from meeting people of various background --- researchers, farmers, JA staffs, teachers, mothers, etc. --- all working on "doing whatever possible in their own place (borrowing from the words of Ms Ando)", while struggling with their constraints, memories, personal feelings, and other issues. The testimonies of these courageous people were so touching that I felt refreshed and empowered.

The experience engraved a deep affection within my heart for Fukushima and its people, and I look forward to coming back again and again, visiting the hot springs and the renowned "Fruit Road" of Date.

I feel like I received a priceless gift from the residents of Fukushima through the workshop. Such treasure should not be left in a jar of clay to be wasted, so I too will do my best in this place where I am, one step after another.

Suggestions for future workshop

The "structured dialogue" introduced by Jacques Lochard, seemed to aim at deepening the understanding of each participants by reciprocating speaking and listening, rather than presentation alone, so that the participants may each be induced to their next step. In order to assist this kind of interaction among the participants, I felt that the following areas had a room for improvement in the future.

1. Seating arrangement

(Although it might be difficult due to the design of the venue and the number of participants) It would have been nice if the participants could look at each other eye-to-eye during the dialogue. A dialogue is not just made up of spoken words alone, its non-verbal information such as facial expression and gesture also convey the message of the speaker and therefore aid understanding.

2. Briefing for the latecomers

(Since the dialogue deepens from the 1st session onwards) I felt the need to strengthen adequate follow-up to the latecomers. Especially if the dialogue had a multi-day schedule, there is a need for a briefing session to these participants, so they could get more flavor of what happened the day before.

3. Post-workshop assignment

If the participants were requested to prepare their comments and suggestions to ICRP workshop while their memories are fresh, these would help enriching the next workshop. Also, giving such assignment beforehand may help the participant to maintain pro-active engagement in the dialogue.

 

=== to here===